Usb vid pid tool
![usb vid pid tool usb vid pid tool](https://interworks.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/3200199098_e9651760c0_b.jpg)
- USB VID PID TOOL MAC OS
- USB VID PID TOOL SERIAL
- USB VID PID TOOL DRIVER
- USB VID PID TOOL SOFTWARE
- USB VID PID TOOL WINDOWS 8
I think that the issue here is more usb.org.
USB VID PID TOOL DRIVER
In cases where driver customisation is required potentially having two products being recognised with the same PID would possibly stop one of them working since the host wouldn't be able to distinguish one from the other.įreescale/NXP offers a simple solution for a dedicated PID for small(ish) product quantities, which I and various collegues have made use of during the last 7 years to simply and cleanly resolve the issue. generic mass storage would be a good addition to the list too.Ī generic PID would not be in accordance with usb.org since a PID refers to a particular product. I honestly think that if NXP publish generic device PIDs for small companies, and hobbyists (members of the maker communities all over the world), to use for the 'well known' interfaces then it will be very good for marketing your processors.
![usb vid pid tool usb vid pid tool](https://www.synology.com/_images/tutorials/How_do_I_check_the_PID_VID_of_my_USB_device/windowspidvid.png)
That's great that we can (basically) apply for a PID to use for our (actually) unique device but for something that is just going to use a simple USB interface to provide some or other functionality an actual unique identifier is somewhat ridiculous. The amount of times I have plugged devices into Linux systems and issued 'lsusb' in the terminal to find that the device is using an unassigned VID, or a VID which clearly does not have anything to do with any 'badge' on the given device, is ridiculous - the keyboard I am tapping this in with at the moment is a prime example of this the Vendor ID does not match the badge and the product ID is not listed under that Vendor ID in the list (hopefully being) maintained at
USB VID PID TOOL WINDOWS 8
inf file with windows 8 to recognize their devices automatically and other manufacturers didn't" I know it's a nuisance to show a Freescale device as a Microchip but somehow Microchip managed to make Microsoft ship a. The downside is that in the Hardware manager the manufacturer will show as "Microchip Technology, Inc.".
USB VID PID TOOL SERIAL
inf files you can set your stack VID to 04D8 and PID to 000A and your device will be recognized as Serial Port automatically, windows 8 has built-in drivers (which is in reality the same drivers used by the inf files posted in this thread that are made by Microsoft) associated to this VID/PID pair. "If you want your CDC device to work in any Windows 8 Machine (32 and 64) without need of drivers or.
USB VID PID TOOL MAC OS
Thanks Hui_Ma, If the devices I am talking about required specialised drivers then this would be worthwhile BUT I am talking about all the small things that well known (and already included in Windows, Linux and Mac OS X) drivers support generic keyboard, generic mouse, generic joystick, generic serial via USB etc etc.įor example, I saw this earlier in another discussion: Re: Windows 8 USB CDC Setup (or. I think that the benefits these, and other PIDs others will probably suggest (given the idea) will give your customers should get your company a lot of kudos from various communities of users of your microprocessors. (Small Chinese company was their vendor, no doubt similar boat to the one I just barely float in.)īasic upshot is that it occurred to me to request the manufacturer of the processor in use for that other device to publish some generic HID product IDs (PIDs) under their Vendor ID for their customers to use without restriction so that small companies, and hobbyists trying to go commercial, can use them without fear of retribution or pedantic behaviour such as Apple appears to be showing there.įreescale Vendor ID is 15a2 and NXP Vendor ID is 1fc9 (formerly Philips VID=0471) - my request to you guys is to publish generalised product IDs under each of these VIDs for my purposes "Generic HID" and "Generic Serial/Com" will suffice. Recently I was approached by somebody with a device which reports as a generic keyboard HID using a bogus VID (simply unassigned/unknown) where the problem was that on MS and (proper) Linux machines this device was accepted and input from it was immediately recognised but when it was connected to an Apple machine running OS X there was a stuff around for the end user to be able to utilise the input and the only thing I could eventually pin it on was the bogus VID/PID combo. For this one product it is far from worth our while to get our own Vendor ID: USB.org - Getting a Vendor ID
USB VID PID TOOL SOFTWARE
I work for a small company and have driven the development of a new product, with MK20DX256VLH7, which uses simple Serial over USB to communicate with management software on a PC.